![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Forge |
My 8800GT is old, but no clear winner has arrived. I tasted some faster with the 4850, but it wasn't enough. I wanted the 4870, but now NV is cheaper and the waters have muddied. Maybe this GTX285 will come in 10% faster, a bunch cooler and quieter, and still hit the current GTX280 price point (~300$-350$ retail, with sales+promos down to occasional 275$). That would be pretty irresistible to me.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
OneArmedScissor |
Still no GDDR5 and a 512 bit bus to increase the cost for no benefit, when GDDR5 has been around for months, has doubled in speed, and chip prices have gone down the toilet...
Boy Nvidia, you're really going places lately! I figured this would be the 8800GTX to 8800GT transition, but I guess that would only make sense. What's next? A 40nm shrink of the 9800GT just after they get around to renaming it for the 3rd time? There may be a recession and things may be sucking for them, but that's not an excuse to practically just give up. This is when everyone should be creating innovative ways to keep costs down, and this, once again, is pretty much the total opposite. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
pogsnet |
How about this ATI HD 5870 coming this January 900Mhz core, 840sp, 48TMUs plus other improvements.
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=2579 http://www.expreview.com/news/hard/2008-12-12/1229072147d10842.html This GTX285 cant beat it again... =p bye nvidia, make your GPU priced lower than ATI then we buy your products No wonder XFX is going to ATI next year http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1... |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
MadManOriginal |
Holy crap, a new name for the dieshrunk GPU?!? Hell hath frozen over.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Palek |
"However, the future card will have higher stock clock speeds, and it will supposedly reduce top power consumption from 236W to just 183W."
Oh, so coming in direct contact with the GPU heatsink will only cause second degree burns now, instead of third degree burns! We are saved! :P But seriously, 183W still sounds ridiculously high to me. My entire desktop computer probably consumes less than that! And for the record, this is not an nVidia flame, just an expression of my utter shock at recent GPU trends. I know high-end ATi/AMD cards are not much better in this regard. |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
aleckermit |
Just a GTX280 replacement, nothing too exciting.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
cobalt |
Speaking of single-GPU crown, why can't they release one of these on a PCB shorter than 10.5" so it's more feasible to run one in a normal-sized case? Yes, they'd need to drop an SLI connector -- heck, or both. But with a more reasonable power draw in the new models, even using one in a SFF chassis might be feasible if it weren't quite so long. And most of those motherboards won't support SLI anyway (due to licensing issues if not a lack of PCIe slots).
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Krogoth |
Too bad that HD 4670/ Geforce 9500 and HD 4850/ Geforce 9800GXT+ make it practically useless for the majority of the market.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
MaxTheLimit |
I think it was pretty much a given that this new card would overtake the GTX 280, but what will be the price? Will it have a better price per dollar than the current nvidia offerings? I wonder if that 10% is actually outperform by that number in ideal situations.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
PRIME1 |
I expect the 65nm cards to drop and price and fade away as stock runs out. They probably stopped making them awhile ago.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |
The idle power of ATi cards is most bothersome, Powerplay doesn't work too well when it can't tell the difference between Aero desktop and a real 3D app and speeds up clocks for Aero and slows down clocks during games.