![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
pogsnet |
GTX 260 GX2 I believe wont run without heatpipe on it not to mention how big is the power consumption it would take. 2000W PSU is not in demand... lols i don't need such ridiculous rig or it will be a good heater for the room. =)
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Umbragen |
Fake or not, why is NVidia taking so long to repackage the G200? It's been over 6 months and still no word on the next big thing. Do we have to wait for the Dual G200 for the whole cycle to start over again?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
flip-mode |
I'd rather look at boobs. Or baby pictures. Or pictures of countless other subjects. Real or fake, that is one uninteresting picture.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ThomasDM |
The photo looks fake, "G200-103-B2" has a different color than the rest of the text.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
designerfx |
I call BS. All around. We'd have more information from some source somewhere than this, if it was legit.
/skeptic hat on |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Usacomp2k3 |
And the new 260 will have the same name as the old one and the old, old one? I like how AMD uses the *50 moniker for 2nd revision or low-power models. Maybe this should be the gtx265?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Voldenuit |
"The new 55nm GTX 260 should quietly cohabitate with its 65nm predecessor"
Knowing nvidia, once the 65nm chips are phased out of the market space, the 55nm chip will then be renamed GTX350 or something... :( |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |
#1 is right, I think.
Look at my unmistakeable forensic analysis:
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/3137/tempme8.jpg
The red lines are all the same layer, just copied across the picture. It was drawn using the nVidia logo's bottom border. The chip's last text block doesn't line up with it.
Hurr, durr, etc.