![]()
| #30. Posted at 09:41 PM on Oct 22nd 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
AbRASiON |
Dual monitor in Starcraft 2 would be nice :)
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
sdack |
Do not get me wrong, if at all am I being an Nvidia fanboy. Still, you could be using an Nvidia card for PhysX acceleration and an ATI card for the graphics. ;)
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
coldpower27 |
Say I have a 9800 GX2, could I use the 9800 GX2 for graphics and an 8800 GT for PhysX? I have a Intel P35 motherboard however, would it work??
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ColdMist |
in full-screen 3D mode, only the "SLI focus display" will render the game, and the secondary display will go dark.
So, with a single card, I can play a game on 1 monitor, leaving the other monitor up for email or whatever, but in SLI I still can't have the second monitor showing the desktop/apps? Ok, does Crossfire do something this stupid? I'll probably wait until next year to buy another video card, but I want the option to add a second card, but I don't want to lose my second monitor while gaming! |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
DancingWind |
i have a question :D Can i Dedicate a gpu to physics and .. then go do the rendering on a radeon?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
robspierre6 |
The big bang 2 is another big fart from N-vidia.It's all about supporting multiple displays in sli which has been offered by AMD for a long time now.And the whole physx on gpu thing is the most stupid idea N-vidia came up with.It's not gonna be applied any soon.We laready have gpus that are struggling in games with primitive texturing and geometry designs.Adding physx to that will make the things much worse.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Krogoth |
Funny that TR's front page pictures show Forged Alliance. A game that is heavily CPU-bounded. SLI and CF is worse for it because they require significantly more CPU-overhead than single-card output.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Damage |
robspierre6 has been banned for repeated personal attacks and rudeness to other users. Read the rules and follow them please, folks.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
SecretMaster |
replying failure!
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ssidbroadcast |
That multi-but-not-SLi option provides for a nice Upgrade path, imo. Got that lousy 8600GTS? Buy a newer card and delegate the 8600 to PhysX. Nice.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Vasilyfav |
Let's say you have a powerful triple-SLI combo, like 3xGTX260. Is there really a point of dedicating a whole GTX260 just for PhysX processing, instead of splitting its load over physics and graphics processing?
It just seems like any one of the cards that support triple-SLI in the first place would be way too powerful just for physics processing. |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |