Yawn. DDR2 800 = completely sufficient.

If I had $549 burning a hole in my pocket, I would spend it on a solid-state drive. I would see much more benefit from that (and it would eliminate noise instead of introducing it with "3 tiny fans")

*sigh* more epenis sticks. I am more interested in cheap 4GB DIMMS. That is what DDR3 promises.

Heh, this ram plus Nehalem equals FAST! All you need is 3 pair (and a winning lotto ticket) ;-)

Wake me up when this hits $30/gb. Maybe then I'll care. Until that point it's just pointless epeening by companies.

CPU caches have been mostly hiding main memory speeds for over a decade. Does having this memory affect real-world performance in any noticable way?

What percentage faster is this Corsair DDR3 compared to generic, cheap, DDR2?

meh, just spend $45 on some ddr2 800 sticks ;p

Pffft. I already have 2500MHz RAM in my computer. I have an uncle that works at Intel and he....

You know, when you try these and discover a sub-single-digit percentage improvement on most tests, you don't have to return them -- they appear to do double duty as personal grooming appliances.

Sheesh. And I thought my 1066MHz DDR2 was a bit over the top.

very fast ram :)