62 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #26. Posted at 04:30 PM on Jun 17th 2008, Edited at 04:32 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

It sounds like a ULV Turion perhaps. 8W is about 4x Atom's rated TDP, but this would probably slap Atom around in per-clock performance. This is more power use than the ULV Celeron M too though, and as a Eee900 user I can say that that is not a good thing. Furnace for your fingers.

I would rather have something that runs cool than something that performs like a desktop for these netbooks. Seriously. It is no fun to use these machines when they run 110F or so on the keyboard and bottom.
collapse

   #61. Posted at 01:46 PM on Jun 18th 2008 Edit   Reply

You guys obviously don't follow the roadmaps. This is Bobcat which was supposed to be under 10W. Since 1GHz is plenty for what a MID or UMPC would do, they can actually C&Q it down to 2W.

As far as the HANDHELD space ATi already has a chip that is in most Motorola phones.
collapse

   #14. Posted at 02:11 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

Why no Fusion-like integrated graphics? I would think that would be attractive to systems integrators of mobile devices.
collapse

   #19. Posted at 03:12 PM on Jun 17th 2008, Edited at 03:15 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

This is the chip AMD should have released in 2003.
Today, or 2009 when/if they release it, it will be a lost cause and will not compete with Gen II Atoms or VIA chips.

Poor AMD, their marketing people are far too well overcompensated for the relative to their weak contributions. These guys should be given $40K/annual salaries, or better yet, a monthly allocation of chocolate bars and seamless panty-hose.
collapse
#35, Indeed...  :   (#54)  «

   #3. Posted at 01:22 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

Expect to see it sometime in the year 2013.
collapse
#22, Dam' strite.  :   (#23)  «

   #5. Posted at 01:29 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

Hey, it's Geode III: Return of the NatSemi!
collapse

   #41. Posted at 09:30 PM on Jun 17th 2008, Edited at 09:35 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

I wonder why haven't we seen that Sempron 2100+ paired with M690 in low-cost subnotebooks ala Asus Eee PC or MSI Wind.

PS: meant as a reply to #34.
collapse

   #46. Posted at 11:09 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

AMD is full of "mysteries" these days. Vapor-phase 45nm processors. Sundry "initiatives" that mysteriously vanish into thin air. ATi trying to milk their current GPU architecture with dual-GPU efforts, since AMD cannot finance any more high-end GPU development.

The only true mystery at AMD is that Hector still has a job and that most of the AMD board have not yet been canned by the stockholders for that ill-timed and ultimately financially-catastrophic ATI acquisition.
collapse

   #36. Posted at 08:15 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

Isn't this chip their Bobcat proc that AMD talked about in Jan. 07. Should be coming out in early 09 last someone reported,
collapse

   #28. Posted at 05:14 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

Just an embedded Sempron, it has been launched some time ago and don't compete with Atom or Nano at all.
collapse

   #15. Posted at 02:19 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

AMD IS THE #1 CHARTWARE COMPANEY! WITH THE AKWEZATION OF ATI
collapse

   #2. Posted at 01:19 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

DDR2-400 seems to be the choice due to power. I would think that lower latency with DDR might be attractive for performance.
collapse

   #21. Posted at 03:42 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

2x L1 cache...that would seem to imply a dual core processor. This would be not bad, as I dont' think there are any duals in that power envelope....yet.
collapse

   #7. Posted at 01:33 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

It would also be cool if they call that chip as "Mystery" as official name.

What do you think guys?
collapse

   #12. Posted at 02:00 PM on Jun 17th 2008, Edited at 03:57 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

Wow its a 45nm Athlon64!
collapse

   #1. Posted at 01:19 PM on Jun 17th 2008 Edit   Reply

Nice chip.

Well what's happening now? Is this progress? We are going back to slower speeds. But this could be useful if it could powerup a cellphone. ^_^
collapse
62 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q