![]()
| #4. Posted at 11:04 AM on May 28th 2008, Edited at 11:05 AM on May 28th 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
Nelliesboo |
To little to late... Beat by MSI... (and it's $399)
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
paulWTAMU |
It's sad to see a market pioneer miss the point entirely isn't it? The early E's were compelling enough for what they were, but given this things size and probable price, why wouldn't you get a 12" laptop instead? With the E 700 series, at least they were a *lot* smaller than a standard lappy. This thing, isn't nearly so much.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
UberGerbil |
Ludi was right -- just as with cars, the subcompact bloat continues until they're no smaller than the model segment to which they used to be a refreshing alternative.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Hattig |
Too large to be a compelling purchase unless the screen is 1280x800 or if it is a lot slimmer.
A second hand 12" iBook or Powerbook is a very viable alternative otherwise, never mind second hand older PC laptops with 10" - 12" screens. The 9" is pushing it in my opinion. An 8" 1024x600 thin-bezel small-keyboard EeePC would be interesting though. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
BoBzeBuilder |
Tiny PC's are taking over the world.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |