77 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #8. Posted at 10:00 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

I like how it's x80 and x60. 60>50 & 80>70! Way to one-up ATi!
collapse

   #62. Posted at 07:28 PM on May 16th 2008, Edited at 07:29 PM on May 16th 2008 Edit   Reply

lol@ complaints about the new naming scheme, ah shut up, you will get used to it. We should be more concerned about performance and technological innovations in the graphics department not naming conventions....
collapse

   #5. Posted at 09:51 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

GTX 280? Sounds like a weenie name.

Oh god, what are they going to do for the next versions? 1280 2280 3280 4280 5280?
collapse

   #12. Posted at 10:18 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

So does this now put ATI a full generation behind NVIDIA?
collapse

   #47. Posted at 04:03 PM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

Again Nvidia with the Epic Fail.

Nvidia: Using GTX across the entire line makes it worthless/irrelevant.

You ALMOST had it right back in the GeForce 6/7/8 scheme.

GeForce (doesn't change, you need this for branding)

6 (major arch, and NO, G92 is not two different arches, so 9600 still == Epic Fail also)
8 (high/main/mid/low/whatever family)
0 (not refresh = 0, refresh = 5)
0 (placeholder to make the number big and impressive)

So 6800 = high end. 6850 = high end plus refresh. 6600 = mainstream. 6400 = mass market 'value' line or whatever. 6200 = crappy low end stuffs. Got the idea so far NV?

8800 GTX == 8800
8800 GTS 512 = 8650
8800 GTS 640 = 8600 640MB
8800 GTS 320 = 8600 320MB
8600GT = 8400

And just DUMP THE FREAKING LETTERS ALTOGETHER. Notice no one is really confusing which Core 2 is which?? GOOD naming scheme. Yours? Not so much. Rework it, don't abandon it.
collapse

   #53. Posted at 11:05 PM on May 15th 2008, Edited at 11:07 PM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

I put this in the graphics forum too...benchmarks of the HD 4870 vs the 9800 GX2

Shows The 4870 leading by over 20% in Crysis @ 16 x 12

If True very sweet!

http://www.dvhardware.net/article26964.html
collapse

   #40. Posted at 02:25 PM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

I'm no longer interested in speed, since my 8800GT is more than enough for what I do with my computer. Significant image quality improvements and must-have new features are the only things that would make me upgrade sooner than the 2 years I plan to keep this card. "faster" just doesn't turn me on that much anymore.
collapse

   #2. Posted at 09:39 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

Both the GTX 280 and the GTX 260 will be based on the next-gen GT200 graphics processor

Now this naming scheme looks simple....
collapse

   #9. Posted at 10:06 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

Does the launch price of Radeon HD 4870 that is very close to that of 9800 GTX tell us something of its performance?
collapse

   #1. Posted at 09:23 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

looking forward to the reviews.
collapse

   #23. Posted at 11:24 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

Cyril,
the GTX 280 is the one with 240 Stream Processors, 1 GB of GDDR3 and a 512 bit memory interface, not the GTX 260.
collapse

   #18. Posted at 10:38 AM on May 15th 2008, Edited at 10:41 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

Maybe someday I'll learn how to use reply properly.
collapse

   #17. Posted at 10:37 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

couple of interesting titles are coming up this fall (staler clear skies, project origin - tba in 2008, hopefully alan wake also tba in 2008) so they better prepare some good drivers for those games
collapse

   #7. Posted at 09:53 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

Hmm, how about DirectX 10.1 support on nVidia side ?
collapse

   #3. Posted at 09:42 AM on May 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

I'm pretty excited about these two launches. I hope they live up to the hype.
collapse
77 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q