98 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #98. Posted at 12:41 PM on May 2nd 2008 Edit   Reply

collapse

   #19. Posted at 12:20 PM on Apr 23rd 2008, Edited at 12:23 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

The question I keep coming back to: Why would I get a graphics chip from anyone other than Nvidia?

Main reasons to stay with Nvidia:
- PhsyX
- More compatible with games than ATI
(Performance is variable although it's stayed in Nvidia's camp for the most part recently)

More devs still use Nvidia solutions. ATI still has issues (check the Cat 8.4 release notes if you care to).
I recently had an HD 3870 in my system and wound up having issues in Tabula Rasa (fixed according to release notes), City of Heroes (doubtful if it'll ever get fixed) and a few other games. It was louder than my 8800GT as well.

I like ATI. I always have. From a gamer's perspective, it just doesn't make sense to own one. I really really want to have a 4870, but the items above keep me holding back and simply waiting for Nvidia's 10.1 solution. So, I'll stick with an 8800GT for now.
collapse
[ Thread capped. Click here to read all 44 replies. ]

   #96. Posted at 12:44 AM on Apr 27th 2008 Edit   Reply

Lots of conclusive statements on here with no actual facts, lets wait for the card to be released then we can act as judges.
collapse

   #34. Posted at 02:06 PM on Apr 23rd 2008, Edited at 02:11 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

If you check the 'open issues' parts of these pdf's, you'll see that nvidia's list is as least as long:

http://uk.download.nvidia.com/Windows/174.74/174.74_WinXP_GeForce_R...
http://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/169.21/169.21_WinXP_Forceware...
http://ru.download.nvidia.com/Windows/169.25/169.25_WinVista_Forcew...

You're talking about the last 4 years. Do you include the fantastic Vista drivers nVidia had a year ago? You know, the ones that caused the most crashes in Vista of all drivers in the world.

Now seriously, i'm running a computer business for the last 10 years and ATI & nVidia both have their pluses and minuses at a driver level. When talking about driver support, you can't be as black & white as you're being.

PS: Reply to Sylvanus - don't know what went wrong!
collapse

   #11. Posted at 11:33 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Bah. Its going to suck, already obvious from the specs and the price tag. Basicaly a 3870 with 480 spu's and higher clocks, making this maybe as fast as a 8800GTX.
collapse

   #84. Posted at 12:26 PM on Apr 24th 2008 Edit   Reply

Looks interesting, can't wait to see how it performs.

What's with all the flames? Patience people.
collapse

   #7. Posted at 10:51 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Fudzilla claims the information is in error. According to Fudo the cards will have 512 bit memory interface and may be as fast as 2500 MHz GDDR5.

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6...
collapse

   #1. Posted at 10:24 AM on Apr 23rd 2008, Edited at 10:25 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

If it is faster in terms of clock to clock speed then Nvidia's top end offering, than i must say Nivida is going to get a big fight from AMD..

I hope it is..
collapse

   #35. Posted at 02:10 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Cyril, why don't you mention that the shader domain on the 4870 is running 1050Mhz and 850Mhz on the 4850?
collapse

   #41. Posted at 03:01 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

ATI vs. Nvidia
Such a highly debatable topic.
Hard to compare by specs since ati and nvidia cards have different architectures.
collapse

   #45. Posted at 04:08 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

I don't understand how ATI can be selling ANY 3870s or 3850s at their current prices. A 9600gt can be had for less than a 3870!
collapse

   #29. Posted at 01:42 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Very good news indeed if it is true. I just got 9600GT 'cause of its price/performance ratio though I was sure I would be getting ATI again. Here in Serbia 9600GT is 130 euros while 3870 is 150+. Math was so simple on that one :).
collapse

   #42. Posted at 03:08 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

ATI vs. Nvidia
Such a highly debatable topic.
Hard to compare by specs since ati and nvidia cards have different architectures.
collapse

   #6. Posted at 10:51 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

I guess they didn't mention anything about the HD 4870 X2?
collapse
#12, Why?  :   (#14)  «

   #18. Posted at 12:18 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Radeon HD 3870 MHz.

I call shenanigans.
collapse

   #17. Posted at 12:16 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Nordichardware has already verified that most of the info posted on that German Website is false.

The only possible truth is that the Radeon 4870 release has been moved up 2 weeks. There are others hinting that, THAT may be true.
collapse

   #16. Posted at 12:14 PM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

This is how is gone be:
Radeon HD 4870 X2 (2 x RV770) - speed 1050/3600 MHz, 1 GB / 2 GB GDDR5, TDP 250 W, price 499 USD;
Radeon HD 4870 (RV770) - frecvenţe de 1050/4400 MHz, 1 GB GDDR5, TDP 150 W, price 299 USD;
Radeon HD 4850 (RV770) - 850/3600 MHz, 512 MB GDDR5, TDP 120 W, price 249 USD;
collapse

   #2. Posted at 10:26 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

"Radeon HD 4850 with lower-clocked GDDR3 memory and specifications otherwise similar to the GDDR5-based 4850."

Go from GDDR5 to GDDR3? What about GDDR4?
collapse

   #10. Posted at 11:10 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

lets see some crysis performance.
collapse

   #3. Posted at 10:29 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

3870MHz effective DDR? That's nearly double the next-fastest in use right now...
collapse

   #4. Posted at 10:36 AM on Apr 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

OK, green team(nV), meed the brown team(DAAMIT), and the blue team(intel). Fight!
collapse
98 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q