53 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #53. Posted at 03:32 PM on Apr 15th 2008 Edit   Reply

This thing looks nice, but I've got to say that the EEE PC has a thing going for it by sticking to the Intel platform. Using a VIA graphics card is begging for trouble in my experience.
collapse

   #52. Posted at 02:53 PM on Apr 10th 2008 Edit   Reply

This looks better than any effort so far, but it's still either too big or the screen is too small.

When will a sub-notebook come with a screen that occupies all the available space, and a build-quality that needs to accompany the "ultraportable" tag?

There's no point in anything being ultraportable if it's also ultrafragile.
I guess what I'm saying is that I'll have to wait for that loathesome apple company to copy the eee. I want an underpowered, undersized macbook running windowsxp.
collapse

   #21. Posted at 02:02 PM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

Save the money and buy a real laptop with a real videocard, ram, etc for another few hundred dollars. The limited power and nil hard drive space are huge turn offs for me. $500 for a very limited machine for $700+ dollars for a LOT more?
collapse

   #37. Posted at 07:32 PM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

I feel like this seems too expensive for the price. It's not likely to show up on sale because it's a niche item, and even back in august I found my Girlfriend a laptop with a C1D and DVD Burner for 449, no rebates... upping it to a full GB of ram was only another 50 bucks.

Yes, I know it's an 'ultraportable,' but I feel like it's in that bizzare price range where someone spending that much on a laptop will want something better powered... and will thus either buy a 'full' laptop or will save up for a better equipped ultraportable.
collapse

   #47. Posted at 10:37 AM on Apr 9th 2008 Edit   Reply

Geez, they should've at least used via's Isaiah or an Atom processor. That thing is sluggish, even for everyday tasks.
collapse

   #45. Posted at 10:22 AM on Apr 9th 2008 Edit   Reply

Screen resolutions are finally getting decent. I'd like to have one of these. I think the price is a little high.

After thesis is over and done I'd love to sell my full size laptop and get one of these instead.
collapse

   #39. Posted at 09:35 PM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

Sweet! Once this platform size gets switched over to Atom (aka decent horsepower) I'm gonna buy one for sure. Here's my requirements / reasoning.

I want something with a full size keyboard and a screen with a little bit of resolution. I also want enough processing so that I can watch all my non-hd movies on it. Beyond that I just need it to be durable (so i can throw it in mybackpack and not worry about it), and have good battery life (so i dont have to find an outlet). It needs to do basic software stuff like browse the net, do some calendar action, and word process.

Aka I just want a small, easily transportable device to do basic on the go type of stuff, that can play videos.

Oh yeah it needs to be 550 or less :( preferably closer to 400 :) I think there's a LOT of people that would like a device like this. Basically a super-portable laptop that handles the basics.
collapse

   #19. Posted at 01:31 PM on Apr 8th 2008, Edited at 01:54 PM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

It appears that the C7-M runs cooler than anything other than Atom. I imagine that at 1.2 GHz, it could keep up with a Celeron M at ~700. Maybe.

http://www.intel.com/design/intarch/celeronm/specifications_celeron...
http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/c7-m_ulv/
http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/chipsets/v-series/vx800/index.jsp (chipset?)

IGP sounds like a 1x2 design. Might be able to run games from 5 years ago....
collapse

   #36. Posted at 06:36 PM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

What's the battery life like?

An ultraportable is useless for school if it has to be plugged in all the time.
collapse

   #1. Posted at 10:54 AM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

The Chrome9 ? That's a "super" gaming video card!
collapse

   #3. Posted at 11:08 AM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

The 1 GHz Via chip might be able to keep up with a 600-some MHz Celeron-M. I wonder how a full-on Linux distro will work versus the Eee's customized version.
collapse

   #7. Posted at 11:28 AM on Apr 8th 2008, Edited at 11:28 AM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

i just got a new laptop by everex, it has a 15 widescreen, 1.5 GHZ via cm-7, 512 ram 60 gig hdd. 349. way better deal. the thing is great with xp, down clocks to 400 mhz when using minimal processes. The only bad thing is the 3 cell battery last 90 mins. and it has a dvd player and cd rw.
collapse

   #26. Posted at 03:41 PM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

lol not enough for the $
collapse

   #10. Posted at 11:40 AM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

Man I have been waiting for this to come out to replace my EeePC. However with the specs being way underpowered I think I'll have to pass.
collapse

   #5. Posted at 11:16 AM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

It's too underpowered.
collapse

   #4. Posted at 11:12 AM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

I'll wait until I can see what the VIA Isaiah brings to the table --I think one of these with an Isaiah processor would be kickass.

http://techreport.com/articles.x/13996
collapse

   #2. Posted at 11:04 AM on Apr 8th 2008 Edit   Reply

That looks kickass. Best of the cheap mini books I've seen by far.
collapse
53 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q