22 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #18. Posted at 05:52 PM on Mar 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Each additional cpu core is a pretty big deal. We all agree a windows system benefits from the 2nd core. Many will agree that quads are "overkill".
The triple core for many users will work out to be "just right".

Kinda like the three bears and their porridge.
collapse

   #21. Posted at 10:25 PM on Mar 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Tricore AMDs will be their competition to Intel's Core2Duo. The eventual "Semperon" version of the Phenom will be dual core.
collapse

   #7. Posted at 01:29 PM on Mar 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Yay, another core that can sit around and do nothing (as if this task wasn't already mostly the case with dual core chips) Such progress!
collapse

   #6. Posted at 01:13 PM on Mar 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

I'd much much much rather AMD had a competitive dual core (in terms of the holy trinity: IPC, clockspeed, and power consumption).
collapse

   #1. Posted at 11:21 AM on Mar 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Only 2.3ghz? I wonder how these overclock
collapse

   #5. Posted at 12:11 PM on Mar 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Huh??

I thought these things were AMD's April Fool's Day joke for 2007...
collapse
22 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q