![]()
| #23. Posted at 07:28 AM on Mar 4th 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
bogbox |
good name atom . what's the name of next brand of mobil processor Electron, proton?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
fantastic |
Desktops you say? $10 says if it does happen, it won't be bigger than mini-ITX. Or it will be proprietary or an "industrial" computer.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Tarx |
I do like the name - no it isn't great, but it still a very good pick for Intel.
I'd be interested in one for an Eee class notebook but only if it has HT. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Flying Fox |
Will be looking forward to see an EeePC with this. Can they get to 8-10 hours on standard battery?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
derFunkenstein |
Forget UMPC's, these things need to go into small laptops like the Eee or the Cloudbook and get cheaper laptops out to the masses.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Madman |
Nice to see more energy saving equipment coming out. GeForce 9600, Atom, finally someone does something about those 900W power issues.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
sigher |
uh oh, now intel will copyright the name atom and anybody using atoms will have to pay :/
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
R2P2 |
I think we've reached the point where the number of cores in any new CPU needs to be mentioned, even if it's just one. Atom is single-core only, right? No dual/quad variants?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
rivieracadman |
These would be great chips for light weight tablets or UMPC setups.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |