63 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #17. Posted at 10:12 AM on Feb 11th 2008 Edit   Reply

There is no question I do have a beef with Intel.

You can't read AMD's antitrust complaint without believing at least some of it is true. Further, Intel is now involved in no less than 4 antitrust suits from countries world wide. I don't mean competitors, I mean Japan, Korea, the EU and now the state of New York.

Regarding the The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation patent violation claim... Intel has been sued hundreds of times for similar claims and seems to always settle. I seriously believe they think they can make more money by stealing the tech, then settling the claim later.

Having said that, I do believe we're moving into a competitive environment where AMD will have about 30% of the biz, which is enough to at least keep Intel "honest".

Which ultimately is good for the consumer.

Plus
collapse
# Balls?  :   (#61)  «

   #3. Posted at 08:10 AM on Feb 11th 2008, Edited at 08:12 AM on Feb 11th 2008 Edit   Reply

You do realize that AMD has a superior product. A university is taking Intel to court for stealing a code that is used in the C2D and Penryn (and possibly Nehalem) CPU's which makes them so great. And if the University can prove that the code is theirs, than they are going to become quite wealthy

So technically the C2D and Penryn don't belong to Intel even though they manufactured them. Intel can't even beat AMD without having to resort to stealing or copying others. Just look at Nehalem. Its copying a solution which AMD has been using for years only they are calling it something else.

The C2D and Penryn are still awesome CPU's no doubt about that, and I plan on getting the Q9450 when it comes out. But no credit should be given to Intel for this.

EDIT: New to this forum. This was directed at ScytheBlade

EDIT2: Forgot to mention that Intel may be forced to stop manufacturing the C2d and Penryns. But its unlikely. They will simply have to pay the university for every CPU they sell.
collapse
#12, LOL  :   (#15)  «

   #45. Posted at 08:52 AM on Feb 12th 2008 Edit   Reply

It appears the EU has raided Intels offices yet again:

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206...
collapse

   #1. Posted at 07:29 AM on Feb 11th 2008 Edit   Reply

I'm tempted to post that

AMD is dying, AMD is dying ...

but that would annoy the AMD fanbois ...
collapse
#2, Seconded.  :   (#20)  «

   #21. Posted at 11:23 AM on Feb 11th 2008 Edit   Reply

I doubt that Dell will throw out AMD as they continue to be quite progressive in terms of chipsets, integrated graphics, et al. It's not just about CPUs.
collapse
63 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q