Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Dposcorp, SpotTheCat
mattsteg wrote:I particularly like 6 and 14.
Usacomp2k3 wrote:Yeah, you guys really miss out on the whole dramatic season change thing. I figured this topic would give a chance for interesting photos anywhere, although I was certainly inspired by the season here.Cool, great idea Mattsteg. I'll see if I can't find some time to get out and shoot some stuff. We aren't anywhere close to fall here in Florida though.
mattsteg wrote:Usacomp2k3 wrote:Yeah, you guys really miss out on the whole dramatic season change thing. I figured this topic would give a chance for interesting photos anywhere, although I was certainly inspired by the season here.Cool, great idea Mattsteg. I'll see if I can't find some time to get out and shoot some stuff. We aren't anywhere close to fall here in Florida though.
JustAnEngineer wrote:Something like this diffuser ring looks really clever, but the price scares me away, since it's not a whole lot less than this ring flash.
torax wrote:These are all some great shots. I have found that with my camera, I get the best results by using ISO 50 in burst mode. I'll take five or six shots of the same subject on burst mode, and then at least one will turn out with out any camera shake. If I can find something on which to rest the camera, even better.
I think ultra-compacts are the best for these kinds of shots. Their tiny size allows them to tuck into tiny spaces and rest on the ground to grab some interesting angles of especially small subjects.
Usacomp2k3 wrote:torax wrote:These are all some great shots. I have found that with my camera, I get the best results by using ISO 50 in burst mode. I'll take five or six shots of the same subject on burst mode, and then at least one will turn out with out any camera shake. If I can find something on which to rest the camera, even better.
I think ultra-compacts are the best for these kinds of shots. Their tiny size allows them to tuck into tiny spaces and rest on the ground to grab some interesting angles of especially small subjects.
For still subjects, sure. The only downside is the lag, so if you are trying to take a picture of something mobile, having the faster AF in the dSLR's and the minimal shutter lag are pretty much required. (ever tried to take a picture of a bee flying around some flowers on a P&S? I have, it didn't work very well at all. Especially in Macro mode, the focus took quite awhile on my Canon a620)
FireGryphon wrote:Yeah, this is definitely an area where P&S cameras have some real advantages vs. DSLRs. Short of mounting a (quite pricey) T/S or PC lens a lot of torax's shots would be extremely difficult to replicate.@ Usa, torax, crazybus: Another advantage to P&S cameras is that they have a much larger deeper focal range than larger cameras with larger lenses. Most of the time you can get much more in focus with a P&S than you can with even the best lens on an SLR. Of course, all bests are off if the AF decides not to focus on your intended subject.
FireGryphon wrote:It's an insect home of some sort. My thought was wasps. Some species build mud dwellings like that. Whatever it was they were long gone.@ mattsteg: Is that an anthill on the mobo? It's making my skin crawl just looking at it. Yuck!
FireGryphon wrote:It's Nori. I keep some around to feed some of my fish with and thought that it might be an interesting subject to play around with shooting backlit. I played around with some bread as well but that just didn't give enough contrast.The last group of pictures is pretty cool, though. What is that?
CMRPhoto wrote:Here's a shot I took a little while ago.
Oh, and, uh, hello everyone--there are some really nice shots here.
http://www.cmrphoto.com/img/v0/p719134785-4.jpg