Phenom II X4 965 slips into more modest thermal envelope
AMD hits 3.4GHz with a little more ease
by Scott Wasson — 11:01 PM on November 3, 2009

Some folks scoffed when AMD elected to introduce the Phenom II X4 965 processor back in August with a 140W thermal design power (TDP), because that pushed beyond AMD's customary peak of 125W for desktop processors. The move wasn't without precedent, but it signaled that AMD's 45nm chips couldn't reach the 3.4GHz mark without a bit of extra juice.

Now, some months later, AMD has introduced a revised version of the Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor (say the name in a single breath for extra credit, kids) with a 125W TDP. The thermal improvement comes hand in hand with a couple other tweaks. For one, the memory controller has been altered to support the use of four DDR3 DIMMs at 1333MHz.

Also, an enhanced halt state, C1E, is now supported in hardware. Naturally, implementing power-state switching in hardware is much faster than software, and AMD says that means power management schemes should now have "virtually no impact" on performance. AMD processors have had a bit of a rocky history on this front in recent years, with power-management features potentially compromising performance in certain situations. Sounds like they're cleaning that up. Still, I wouldn't expect much of a difference in regular use. We tested with power management schemes enabled in our last major CPU review, of the Intel Lynnfield processors, and we did some spot checks along the way with power management disabled, too. Generally, we found that enabling and disabling power management had very little to no effect on most tests.

The reduction in the processor's TDP rating comes with a real reduction in power use. Here's a quick glance at power use from the Damage Labs test bench.  These results show full-system power draw following the test methods and configurations outlined in our Lynnfield review.

There's virtually no change to power draw at idle, but power draw under load is down by 9W versus our example of the earlier 140W version of the X4 965. That's good, but then in this particular application, the X4 965's performance just barely surpasses that of the Core i5-750. So the power efficiency picture isn't altered much. Here's the proof.

Still, moving into the 125W thermal envelope ought to allow the X4 965 to find its way into more systems from big PC makers, along with enabling broader compatibility with existing AMD-oriented mobos and CPU coolers.

AMD suggests it may have also bought itself a little more overclocking headroom with this new rev of silicon. And yes, this is an unlocked Black Edition processor. Sadly, we haven't yet had time to test that theory with our X4 965 125W sample. I do feel a CPU comparison coming on, though. Perhaps soon.

Oh, and if you're looking to purchase the 125W version of the X4 965, look for a part number ending in M, as in HDZ965FBK4DGM, or modest or meek. That's the 125W model. The part number for the 140W version ends in I, as in HDZ965FBK4DGI, or incinerate or inferno. Just sayin'.TR

Related articles

  • Intel's Core i7 comes to notebooks
    October 6, 2009

    Nehalem has finally arrived for notebooks in the form of Clarksdale Core i7 mobile processors that are virtually identical to their Lynnfield desktop counterparts. Keep reading to see how the new Core i7-920XM performs inside a cutting-edge portable gaming rig. Read more...

    57 comments
    Last by MadManOriginal at 1:59 PM on 10/11/09

  • Intel's Core i5-750 and Core i7-870 processors
    September 8, 2009

    These new Core i5 and i7 processors promise to enable systems that are faster, cheaper, quieter, smaller, and more energy efficient than prior desktop PCs. Has Intel pulled it off? Keep reading to find out. Read more...

    341 comments
    Last by Trymor at 12:04 PM on 09/25/09

  • AMD's Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor
    August 13, 2009

    The Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor could compute Pi to an insane number of digits during the time it takes to pronounce its full name, in part because it runs at a rather high-strung clock rate of 3.4GHz. But mostly because of the name. Read more...

    105 comments
    Last by ish718 at 12:58 AM on 08/20/09

  • A bevy of new desktop processors arrives
    June 9, 2009

    AMD and Intel have deluged us with new CPUs. The result? An enormous roundup of 26 different types of processors, including five brand-new ones. We've poked, prodded, tested for performance, measured power efficiency, overclocked, and considered the value propositions for CPUs from $87 to $999. Read more...

    136 comments
    Last by blubje at 3:01 PM on 08/01/09

  • AMD's 'Istanbul' six-core Opteron processors
    June 1, 2009

    The new "Istanbul" Opteron packs six cores into a single chip, which makes it the fastest, most power-efficient Opteron yet. But can it match Intel's formidable Nehalem Xeons? The answer might surprise you in more ways than one. Read more...

    117 comments
    Last by pluscard at 9:35 PM on 06/13/09

  • GlobalFoundries gears up
    May 7, 2009

    Last week, we traveled to the offices of GlobalFoundries to meet with the firm's executives and to understand their plans for the newly minted chip foundry created by the spin-off of AMD's manufacturing division. Read more...

    15 comments
    Last by moritzgedig at 4:06 AM on 05/12/09

  • AMD's Phenom II X4 955 processor
    April 23, 2009

    With the introduction of the Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition, AMD matches its world record for longest CPU name. Even better, this is the fastest desktop CPU the company has ever produced, and it goes toe to toe with one of Intel's best Core 2 Quad processors. Read more...

    121 comments
    Last by ish718 at 8:26 AM on 04/30/09

  • Intel's Xeon W5580 processors
    March 31, 2009

    Intel's Nehalem-based Xeons are finally here, and they've left us gasping for air. This may well be the largest performance jump from one CPU generation to the next that we've ever seen. The downside? We're still looking for one. Read more...

    77 comments
    Last by Sunburn74 at 7:26 PM on 04/06/09

Tags: CPUs

Copyright ©1999-2009 The Tech Report. All rights reserved.
About us | Privacy policy | Subscribe to our mailing list