Conclusions
Well, jeez, it's hard not to like the Phenom II X3 720, which is just a bundle of gimpy goodness. Thanks to its higher clock speed and larger cache, the X3 720 quite frequently outperforms its bigger brother, the Phenom II X4 810, even though it costs less. And, at 2.8GHz, the 720 is fast enough to match up pretty well against the Core 2 Duo E8400 in many applicationsincluding gamesthat tend to run best with fewer and faster cores. In more widely multithreaded apps where the 720's third core kicks in, the Phenom II X3 almost always outruns the E8400, sometimes dramatically. Oddly enough, the 720's combination of three cores and relatively high clock speeds may be the ideal trade-off for the current state of PC software. Who knew?
Add in the X3 720's fairly tame power consumption, its apparently excellent overclocking proposition, and the fact thatregardless of memory typethe Phenom II has a superior system architecture to the Core 2, and the E8400 starts to look rather weak by comparison. The Phenom II X3 720 is our new favorite among mid-range PC processors. Look for it to secure a place in one of the builds in our upcoming system guide refresh.
The Phenom II X4 810 is also generally faster and more attractive overall than the Core 2 Quad Q8200, but I can't say I like the value propsition with either of these processors all that well. Because of their reduced cache sizes and clock speeds, these value quad-cores rely almost entirely on multithreaded applications to achieve strong performance. When software doesn't oblige (and it often doesn't), they stumble, as illustrated by the Q8200's poor showings in several of our benchmarks, including MS Office, Firefox, and the gaming tests. For the vast majority of users, the Phenom II X3 720 will be a better choice, and it costs less.
Oh, and we didn't see much in the way of performance gains when moving the Phenom II X4 810 from DDR2 memory to DDR3 memory. That's no great shock, all things considered, and no knock on AMD's implementation of Socket AM3. I suspect we may see more benefits from DDR3 once we get our hands on a non-neutered Socket AM3 quad-core, like a Phenom II X4 940 or something even faster, especially if AMD builds in support for higher memory frequencies. Until then, Socket AM3 is a fine upgrade path waiting for a reason to exist.

-
204 comments —
Last by ish718 at 8:40 PM on 02/26/09 - Email the author(s): Scott Wasson
- Sign up to receive notices when we publish new articles
- Or go back to TR's front page
-
Phenom II X4 965 slips into more modest thermal envelope
Some folks scoffed when AMD introduce the Phenom II X4 965 processor back in August with a 140W thermal design power. Now, some months later, AMD has introduced a revised version with a 125W TDP. Read more...
68 comments —
Last by MadManOriginal at 4:35 PM on 11/06/09 -
Intel's Core i7 comes to notebooks
Nehalem has finally arrived for notebooks in the form of Clarksdale Core i7 mobile processors that are virtually identical to their Lynnfield desktop counterparts. Keep reading to see how the new Core i7-920XM performs inside a cutting-edge portable gaming rig. Read more...
57 comments —
Last by MadManOriginal at 1:59 PM on 10/11/09 -
Intel's Core i5-750 and Core i7-870 processors
These new Core i5 and i7 processors promise to enable systems that are faster, cheaper, quieter, smaller, and more energy efficient than prior desktop PCs. Has Intel pulled it off? Keep reading to find out. Read more...
341 comments —
Last by Trymor at 12:04 PM on 09/25/09 -
AMD's Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor
The Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor could compute Pi to an insane number of digits during the time it takes to pronounce its full name, in part because it runs at a rather high-strung clock rate of 3.4GHz. But mostly because of the name. Read more...
105 comments —
Last by ish718 at 12:58 AM on 08/20/09 -
A bevy of new desktop processors arrives
AMD and Intel have deluged us with new CPUs. The result? An enormous roundup of 26 different types of processors, including five brand-new ones. We've poked, prodded, tested for performance, measured power efficiency, overclocked, and considered the value propositions for CPUs from $87 to $999. Read more...
136 comments —
Last by blubje at 3:01 PM on 08/01/09 -
AMD's 'Istanbul' six-core Opteron processors
The new "Istanbul" Opteron packs six cores into a single chip, which makes it the fastest, most power-efficient Opteron yet. But can it match Intel's formidable Nehalem Xeons? The answer might surprise you in more ways than one. Read more...
117 comments —
Last by pluscard at 9:35 PM on 06/13/09 -
GlobalFoundries gears up
Last week, we traveled to the offices of GlobalFoundries to meet with the firm's executives and to understand their plans for the newly minted chip foundry created by the spin-off of AMD's manufacturing division. Read more...
15 comments —
Last by moritzgedig at 4:06 AM on 05/12/09 -
AMD's Phenom II X4 955 processor
With the introduction of the Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition, AMD matches its world record for longest CPU name. Even better, this is the fastest desktop CPU the company has ever produced, and it goes toe to toe with one of Intel's best Core 2 Quad processors. Read more...
121 comments —
Last by ish718 at 8:26 AM on 04/30/09
