Conclusions
So the BIOS-based workaround for the TLB erratum can have quite an effect on performance. How close were the estimates we've heard of a 10% performance drop? Let's summarize our results and consider the percentage differences.
| No TLB patch | TLB patch | Difference | |
| Sandra cache and memory bandwidth | 6527 | 5932 | 9.6% |
| Sandra memory bandwidth - FPU | 5403 | 3650 | 38.7% |
| Sandra memory bandwidth - ALU | 5401 | 3648 | 38.7% |
| CPU-Z memory access latency | 59 | 99 | 50.6% |
| WorldBench - Microsoft Office 2003 SP-1 | 369 | 399 | 7.8% |
| WorldBench - Adobe Photoshop CS2 | 521 | 595 | 13.3% |
| WorldBench - Firefox | 298 | 536 | 57.1% |
| WorldBench - Microsoft Windows Media Encoder 9.0 | 248 | 272 | 9.2% |
| WorldBench - WinZip 10 | 305 | 321 | 5.1% |
| picCOLOR overall score | 9.74 | 7.21 | 29.9% |
| Valve Source engine particle simulation benchmark | 62 | 55 | 12.0% |
| Valve VRAD map build time | 182 | 191 | 4.8% |
| SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Integer x16 | 130697 | 130648 | 0.04% |
| SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Floating Point x8 | 169434 | 169373 | 0.04% |
| Total average difference | 19.8% | ||
| Average difference without memory subsystem tests | 13.9% | ||
Across every test we ran, the difference between the Phenom 9600 with and without the TLB patch averages out to 19.8%. However, if we rule out the synthetic memory tests and consider only the application tests, that difference drops to 13.9%.
The most troubling results here are the applications where we see large performance drops with the TLB erratum workaround active, including the Firefox web browser and the picCOLOR image analysis tool. If one happens to spend a lot of time running an application whose memory access patterns don't mix well with the TLB patch, the result could prove frustrating. The BIOS-based workaround for the TLB erratum may achieve its intended resultsystem stabilitybut it comes at a pretty steep price in terms of performance.
For the average retail PC consumer, this price might not be unacceptable. After seeing the Firefox test results, I spent some time browsing the web with our Phenom-based test system, and it didn't feel noticeably sluggish to me compared to most modern PCs. Then again, I doubt whether the average sort of consumer is likely to purchase a system with a quad-core processor. One wonders where that leaves AMD and the PC makers currently shipping Phenom-based PCs. I'm not sure a recall is in order, but a discount certainly might be. And folks need to know what they're getting into when purchasing a Phenom 9500 or 9600-based computer this holiday season. Caveat emptor, indeed.
In fact, a credible source indicated to us that at least some of the few high-volume customers who are still accepting Barcelona Opterons with the erratum are receiving "substantial" discounts for taking the chips. One would hope consumers would get the same consideration. The trouble is, I doubt AMD would have shipped Phenom processors in this state were it not feeling intense financial pressure.
AMD's other major concern here should be for its reputation. The company really pulled a no-no by representing Phenom performance to the press (and thus to consumers) without fully explaining the TLB erratum and its performance ramifications at the time of the product's introduction.
As we've reported elsewhere, AMD does plan to fix the TLB erratum with a new revision of its quad-core chip due some time in mid-to-late Q1 of 2008. Once the new revision is available, the Phenom 9500 and 9600 will be replaced by the 9550 and 9650, with the -50 suffix denoting the updated silicon and higher performance. Most users will want to wait until those new Phenom models are available before paying full price for a Phenom processor or a system based on one.
-
211 comments —
Last by pluscard at 9:34 AM on 12/21/07 - Email the author(s): Scott Wasson
- Sign up to receive notices when we publish new articles
- Or go back to TR's front page
-
A bevy of new desktop processors arrives
AMD and Intel have deluged us with new CPUs. The result? An enormous roundup of 26 different types of processors, including five brand-new ones. We've poked, prodded, tested for performance, measured power efficiency, overclocked, and considered the value propositions for CPUs from $87 to $999. Read more...
135 comments —
Last by blockhead at 8:54 PM on 06/20/09 -
AMD's 'Istanbul' six-core Opteron processors
The new "Istanbul" Opteron packs six cores into a single chip, which makes it the fastest, most power-efficient Opteron yet. But can it match Intel's formidable Nehalem Xeons? The answer might surprise you in more ways than one. Read more...
117 comments —
Last by pluscard at 9:35 PM on 06/13/09 -
GlobalFoundries gears up
Last week, we traveled to the offices of GlobalFoundries to meet with the firm's executives and to understand their plans for the newly minted chip foundry created by the spin-off of AMD's manufacturing division. Read more...
15 comments —
Last by moritzgedig at 4:06 AM on 05/12/09 -
AMD's Phenom II X4 955 processor
With the introduction of the Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition, AMD matches its world record for longest CPU name. Even better, this is the fastest desktop CPU the company has ever produced, and it goes toe to toe with one of Intel's best Core 2 Quad processors. Read more...
121 comments —
Last by ish718 at 8:26 AM on 04/30/09 -
Intel's Xeon W5580 processors
Intel's Nehalem-based Xeons are finally here, and they've left us gasping for air. This may well be the largest performance jump from one CPU generation to the next that we've ever seen. The downside? We're still looking for one. Read more...
77 comments —
Last by Sunburn74 at 7:26 PM on 04/06/09 -
A fresh look at processor value
17 processors. 22 benchmarks. 64 graphs. One epic study of how some of today's most popular enthusiast processors compare in terms of performance per dollar. Read more...
104 comments —
Last by lycium at 10:42 PM on 03/28/09 -
AMD puts on the ritz with six-core Opteron demo
How does 24 cores in Task Manager sound? We saw it happen when AMD gave us an exclusive first demo of its upcoming six-core Opteron in action. Could this be the answer to Nehalem that AMD needs? Read more...
54 comments —
Last by pogsnet at 6:12 PM on 03/02/09 -
AMD's Socket AM3 Phenom II processors
The latest processors from AMD add support for DDR3 memory and come in more affordable triple- and quad-core flavors. We like one of them quite well. Which one? And how does DDR3 memory affect performance? Keep reading for the answers. Read more...
204 comments —
Last by ish718 at 8:40 PM on 02/26/09
